The EQ Paradox: Why High Emotional Intelligence Leaders Aren’t Always Top Performers

Mar 2, 2024
by Pierre COLLOWALD

By acknowledging both the strengths and the blind spots of high‑EQ leadership, we can better guide executives toward a balanced, high‑impact approach.

In executive search we often celebrate high emotional intelligence (EQ) as the gold standard for leadership. Leaders who are self‑aware, emotionally balanced, and adept at building cohesive teams earn admiration, respect, and consistently strong 360‑degree reviews.

But an unintended side‑effect can emerge.

The hidden trade‑off

Leaders with high EQ aren’t always the top performers. As executive search professionals, we often view high EQ as the ultimate asset—leaders who are self-aware, emotionally balanced, and skilled at building strong teams. They’re appreciated, respected, and listened to. And their 360 reviews? Stellar!

But there’s a catch. In their pursuit of harmony and consensus, high-EQ leaders can become predictable, even risk-averse. They often shy away from the spotlight, prioritizing the team while stepping back from their own leadership role.

The desire to keep the team comfortable can lead them to:

  • Step back from the spotlight, letting others take the lead.
  • Prioritize group cohesion over bold decision‑making.
  • Avoid conflict, even when decisive action is needed.

What the market demands today

Modern organizations increasingly look for charismatic, risk‑taking leaders—individuals who:

  • Inspire and energize their teams.
  • Make bold moves that drive growth.
  • Lead with conviction, even when the path is uncertain.

This creates a tension between the steady, relationship‑focused style of high‑EQ leaders and the dynamic, visionary style that many companies now prize.

Finding the balance

So, where’s the balance? It’s not simple. There is no one‑size‑fits‑all answer, but a more nuanced perspective can help:

  1. Blend EQ with strategic boldness – Encourage leaders to use their emotional insight to read team dynamics, then pair that awareness with calculated risk‑taking.
  2. Develop adaptive leadership skills – Provide coaching that expands comfort zones, allowing high‑EQ leaders to step into visible, decisive roles when needed.
  3. Align expectations with culture – Match leadership styles to the organization’s stage of growth; early‑stage firms may need daring visionaries, while mature companies might benefit from stabilizing EQ strengths.

By acknowledging both the strengths and the blind spots of high‑EQ leadership, we can better guide executives toward a balanced, high‑impact approach.

Pierre COLLOWALD is an Equity Partner and Board Member at ROBERTSON ASSOCIATES, where he has led organic and external growth initiatives since 2010. With an MBA from the Rotterdam School of Management and dual business degrees from France and Germany, he brings extensive senior management experience in the advisory sector, particularly in industrial services, manufacturing, and consulting.

View Pierre’s profile on LinkedIn

Want to dive deeper?